Bias in Media--ENG 3010

This week in class we discussed the topic of liberal media into more depth. To start with we watched a video from CNN’s Crossfire during the time of the 2004 presidential election. This was the one when Jon Stewart---the host of the Daily Show makes an appearance on the show. On the show, Jon Stewart runs into an argument with the hosts and accuses the hosts of not carrying out their jobs honestly and seriously. He blamed the two hosts of not conducting the debate on the show truthfully and that they were hurting America. He told them that they were supposed to deliver real, serious news and not entertainment. The two hosts accused Jon Stewart of doing the same. Jon Stewart in response to that argued that as a comedian, he was supposed to entertain the people.
After watching the debate, we openly discussed our viewpoints on the Jon Stewarts’ accusations. Most of us in the class, agreed with him but at the same came up with the interesting point that Jon Stewart should also attempt to make his show a little more current-news oriented because most of the young men in America get their daily news feed by watching his show which was scary because Jon is good as entertainment but not the best when it comes to getting serious news from his show.
Later this wee we talked about different kinds of media that exists. The class was divided into 5 groups and each group was assigned one type of media. The group’s job was to come up with any kind of political bias that we could find in our respective media. My group is assigned the ‘Internet’ as the media. So my group members have decided to check out a variety of websites where we can potentially find political bias. We have one week to do some research and at the end of the next week, we are expected to present, to the class, a brief presentation on our findings.

Liberal Media---ENG 3010

Okay so this week in our English class we did not do anything specific. We continued talking about Host by David Foster Wallace (which by the way is an interesting read if you ever get a chance). We also talked a little about the vice presidential debate (which I expected to be a very funny one but instead turn out to be one of the most serious debates I ever watched. All my roommates and I were waiting anxiously for Sarah Palin to say something stupid one more time.. but not this time. She was well prepared and made a huge comeback by directly attacking Obama and Biden). On Friday we actually talked about something that not many people are concerned about. We talked about Liberal media and its role during this critical election time. My professor expected all of us to have heard this term like a million times. But as far I am concerned, it was the first time ever that I heard of the term. LOL. I read the article from THE NATION on Liberal Media which gave me a better understanding of what exactly it meant.
Liberal Media was often used as an excuse by the conservatives for conservative failures. They blamed it on the media to give special coverage to the liberals so that the liberals could better communicate their ideas to the larger masses of the people. But some republicans are honest enough to admit that there is no such thing as bias towards the liberals by the media. Patrick Buchanan, one of the most conservative presidential candidates in Republican history, admitted that he could not identify any allegedly liberal bias against him during his presidential campaigns. He admitted to have equal and balanced coverage.
Personally I believe that the media is not biased towards either the left wing or the right wing. They choose to give broader coverage to the stories of either party-----stories that will attract more viewers to their news channels. With cut throat competition among the news channels, the media cannot afford to side either one of the two parties. The media is no longer neutral. It’s all about their own monetary profit. They select their news based on how many viewers and advertisement sponsorers they can get. For example, ABC World News and CNN News TV channels made a big deal about Sarah Palin’s controversial remarks in several interviews earlier last month. This might make it seem that there is a strong and powerful existence of liberal media. But it’s not exactly true. Sean Hannity of Fox news delivered a special report entitled ‘Obama and Friends’ where he questioned Obama’s worthiness to be the next commander-in-chief. According to Sean Hannity, Obama has had close ties with various radical and terrorist organizations in the past which makes him unfit to lead America. So in the end it all ends up to PERSONAL BIAS. It all depends on what news channel appeals YOU the most and what news YOU choose to watch more often. Bias lies in every step of our lives and it is practically impossible to have a bias-free society. Its something we have to get used to.
I am calling it night, tune back next week!

Grades do not fulfill the main purpose of learning---ENG 3010

I feel that the present grading system is not effective in evaluating a person’s qualifications. Grades act against the main purpose of learning. Grades focus one’s all attention on tests. Academic success is no longer measured in terms of knowledge but in grade points. Students hardly retain the knowledge after the final exam as only the points scored in it counts. Grades, hence, prevent from enriching one’s mind.

It’s not grade that keeps one going. It is a disbelief that one would never volunteer to undergo the misery to learn the topics one is least interested in. Learning happens when one has the desire to know new things for his own self. One does not need grades to learn to walk, talk, drive, dance etc. One hangs on to these with his life but loses hold of the very subjects on which he is graded. I would like to use a very appropriate and interesting metaphor to support my point. Compare grades to a game of cards. Just as one starts a new round after shuffling the previous cards, one starts a new term and hardly retains anything from his pervious terms.

Therefore I believe that true knowledge does not take place in class. But instead
it can achieved through conversing with the intellectuals and scholars about something that fascinates you the most.

Host's Classroom Discussion---ENG 3010

So this week in our English 3010 class, we were assigned to read David Foster Wallace’s ‘Host’. To comment on the reading I went to be honest and said that it was a ridiculously long reading assignment and was way too confusing as well. The first thing, I noticed about the reading were the crazy arrows and boxes. The boxes served the same purpose as the footnotes but it looked nothing like the footnotes. Footnotes generally lie at the bottom of the page and they are just 3-4 lines. But the boxes were as big as a paragraph. So the strategy that I tried to apply was to first read the entire article by completely ignoring the boxes. But the boxes were less ignorable because they were right in the middle of the main text for most times. In case of the footnotes, I, like most readers, would be more inclined to skip them. But in cases of boxes, one can’t do that. So the author does the good job of making the reader pay more attention to the sub-text. For the most part, the boxes were as big and fat as a paragraph. They broke the main text visually, and you had to read over the box to get to the next paragraph of the article.

The concept of boxes was completely new for me. I never came across a reading like this before. I had a tough time reading the boxes along with the paragraph. So I read one paragraph, then, read the boxes pertaining to it. I skipped a few big boxes in between which made my reading even tougher because some of the boxes that I did read, referred to the boxes, I hadn’t read earlier.

I found the reading little funny at few places. For example, on page number 319, there is a ?! inside a box. It was the smallest box of the entire reading. It was funny in a bizarre way because those two characters are just lying there inside the box. You can’t even ignore looking at it, because it’s right in the middle of the main text. Another thing that I thought it was funny was that, in some cases, there were boxes inside the boxes which were kinda cool. Sometimes, the boxes contained more humorous information related to the articles. Due to the boxes, it seemed like you, as a reader, were sitting right to David Foster Wallace and you were having a live conversation with him. It seemed like the author himself was telling you a story (in a box) and while he was talking, he remembered another story (box inside the box).

This was pretty much what we did this entire week. Everyday we discussed the reading in a variety of different aspects of literature. I like the classroom discussion sessions like this one. Stay tuned for more next week!

Bartleby's Classroom Discussion---ENG 3010

Today was the start of the second week of classes for my English 3010 class. We were assigned to read Melville's "Bartleby the Scrivener. It was an interesting one read. On Monday, in class, the students arranged themselves in a circular group and began discussing the assigned reading. Everyone came to an agreement that it was an interesting read. Everyone loved the main character Bartleby. His stubbornness is what made him so irritating but at the same time, the point of focus.
The narrator, an elderly lawyer who had a very comfortable business relates the story of the strangest man he had ever known.
The narrator had employed two scriveners, Nippers and Turkey to help him out with his work. Nippers suffered from indigestion, and Turkey was a drunk. In the mornings Turkey was sober and Nippers was very unproductive. But in the afternoon Nippers calms down even though Turkey was drunk. Hence everything worked out smoothly for the narrator in a bizarre way. The narrator then later on hired a sad and lonely looking young man named Bartleby.
In the beginning, Bartleby was very enthusiatic to work at his place. He would be the frist man to arrive at the office and the last man to leave. He would not even take a lunch break. One day, when the narrator asks Bartleby to help proofread a copied document, Bartleby answers simply, "I would prefer not to." It is the first of Bartleby's many refusals. As time goes by, Bartleby performs fewer and fewer duties around the office. The narrator tried several times to find out the reason for his refusals. But everytime, no matter what , he would give them the same exact answer : I prefer not to.” Soon a point comes, when he is doing no work at all. The narrator felt as if bartleby has a strange kind of control over him. The narrator could not get him to leave.
Thus, out of desperation to get rid of bartleby, the narrator moves his offices to a new location. But bartleby still continues to show up everyday at the same place. Though the new tenants expelled Bartleby from the offices, he still would return back daily. Soon bartleby is arrested and put in prison for refusal to leave the premises. At the prison, Bartleby seems even more gloomy than usual. He refused to eat or drink anything. The narrator returns a few days later to check on Bartleby, only to discover that Bartleby had died out of starvation.
The story ends with a mystery unsolved. No one ever came to find out the reason behind Bartleby’s strange behavior. In all my life this is the first time ever that I read a story with a unsolved mystery. The narrator ends the story abruptly by killing bartleby, leaving room for the readers to make their own conclusions. However, there is one rumor that sort of throws some insight into bartlby’s life. Bartleby previously worked in a Dead Letter Office but lost his job there. The narrator assumes that the dead letters would have made Bartleby's temperament sink into an even darker gloom.
In the class, all week we discussed about various reasons that made Bartleby totally aloof from the social world around him. it was a really lively discussion because everyone in class used their own wild imaginations to come up with a different ways the story might have ended. We even discussed that if the story (orginally writtten in 1856) was to be rewritten in today’s age, what kind of a personality would he have and in what ways would he be similar and different from the old bartleby. One of the interesting suggestions that came up was the today’s ‘New” Bartleby would be kind of a punk with earings and tatoos all over his body. He would a student who would work very hard in the beginning of the semester and then rite in the middle of the semester would suddenly stop working totally. He would still continue taking classes each semester as long as they are in the same room.
In short, this week I really enjoyed going and participating in class. Next week there is some different reading assinment. I hope it is as interesting as Bartleby’s.